“Like many other Republicans, particularly on Long Island, won because of the view that this was an issue-driven election and the issue this year was crime.” Indeed, a red wave did run through New York on November 8, where even Sean Patrick Maloney-the person tasked with steering Democrats to another majority-lost his own race. “Santos didn’t win the race based on his campaign or who he is,” he said. They didn’t see the Republican tidal wave coming in New York, and so they didn’t focus on the race.” Jacobs, too, echoed this sentiment. Zimmerman says his campaign “was unrelenting in getting people’s attention” but that, ultimately, “I think part of the problem, quite frankly, was everyone saw this as not a competitive seat. The bulk of the 87-page research document leans into Santos’s ties to Trump and his antiabortion stance. The document does, however, list Santos’s educational and professional claims without question. It noted the IRS’s lack of knowledge of the congressman-elect’s animal-rescue charity and raised questions about his financial status. Santos’?” And the DCCC’s research memo on Santos outlined many of the allegations made in the Times report. The piece even quoted an anonymous Republican leader as saying, “Are we being played as extras in ‘The Talented Mr. One column in The North Shore Leader noted the eye-popping increase in Santos’s net worth from less than $5,000 to more than $11 million over a period of two short years. (This organization did not respond to a Vanity Fair interview request.) Local news organizations did raise questions in their coverage of Santos. The Democrat did spend a total of $22,000 over three payments on Deep Dive Political Research, an opposition research firm, per FEC filings. Zimmerman raised slightly more than Santos did. It’s hard to fully comprehend what went wrong for Democrats in this race. But what they didn’t really grasp, or really understand, is he was also the Anna Delvey candidate of this congressional midterm election cycle,” he added, a reference to the infamous grifter of the New York social scene. “The media knew that he was a Trump, Marjorie Taylor Greene candidate. Robert Zimmerman, Santos’s Democratic opponent, insists the “information was certainly out there way before he was elected.” “I’m certainly not shocked by the story,” Zimmerman, who lost to Santos by 8 points, tells me Tuesday morning. Which all begs the question: How is all this getting attention now, after the election? Yet, Santos is set to be sworn into the House of Representative for New York’s Third Congressional District in less than a month. His consistent deceit and blatant lies show us exactly the type of failure he’ll be in Congress.” Jay Jacobs, the chair of the New York Democratic Party, tells me Tuesday he thought the scope of the report was “astounding.” The spokesperson for the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, the official campaign arm of the House Democrats, Nebeyatt Betre, said in a statement that Santos is a “serial liar who has managed to prove week after week just how completely undeserving he is of representing Long Island. A full-fledged blame game is underway within Democratic circles following a bombshell investigative report that threw much of Republican Congressman-elect George Santos’s purported background into question. On Monday The New York Times reported that it could not confirm Santos’s claims about his work history or his education the article highlighted a potentially fraudulent charity run by the soon-to-be lawmaker, shed light on highly questionable campaign finance practices, and couldn’t track the origins of his riches.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |